The Report Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy
Izvor: KiWi
Trenutačna izmjena od 12:54, 27. siječnja 2014.
If you're perhaps not mixed up in search engine optimization group, January 21st, 2007 probably held no meaning for you. To study more, please take a glance at: seo expert services . Browse here at the link seo optimization company to research the reason for this hypothesis. However, if you are a search engine marketer or SEO, you probably remember whilst the day January 21st that Wikipedia died. Learn additional information on orange county website design company by going to our impressive article directory. To the untrained eye, Wikipedia is precisely the same today as it had been six months before. But, when you get below the top and take a peek, you is able to see one difference that has had an impact on the world of se optimization: NOFOLLOW. In the words of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' attribute is an simple way for a site to tell search-engines that the web site cant or doesnt wish to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was mainly used for blog comments. That helped blog owners cut down on comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also used in some situations to represent a link, but this is a whole other conflict that can need to be preserved for another article. On each and every outgoing link the main reason that Wikipedias use of NOFOLLOW caused such a mix is basically because a lot of people viewed it as one of the most hypocritical decision that Wikipedia may have made. The reason why that Wikipedia is becoming so common and performs so well in the SERPs is that people and site owners typically reference Wikipedia. When they do this, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. Discover new info on the affiliated article - Click here: guaranteed search engine optimization . Each time that this process occurs, Wikipedia gains a bit more popularity in the search engines. When Wikipedia decided to apply the NOFOLLOW tag, they are showing the various search engines that while we guide a website and may use content from it in our report, we do not want you to give any credit to it. It is for this reason that lots of have started to view Wikipedia as a hypocrisy. Wikipedia might have chosen another way for fighting spam that did not punish quality internet sites which deserve to be recognized by Wikipedia, although NOFOLLOW has probably reduce the total amount of spam Wikipedia has to fight, but as numerous others have said.
