Google frowns on reciprocal linking

Izvor: KiWi

Trenutačna izmjena od 23:49, 6. rujna 2014.

Google frowns on reciprocal linking

This is a subject that absolutely everyone appears to be arguing about at the moment. Absolutely everyone trying to second-guess Google's actions - which they will By no means do - and wondering whether reciprocal linking is dead, dying or if it is some thing worth carrying on.

'Nuff of the speculation. Here's the proof.

Google do not like reciprocal link directories and they can sniff 1 out a mile off. There was (notice the use of the past tense right here) a link directory on my web site till not too long ago, but I have now removed it, simply because it had become as beneficial as a chocolate teapot.

While the main front page of the site has retained it is Google PageRank of PR5, in one of their last updates, Google relegated that directory, which had also previously had a PR5, to a PR .

Meanwhile, I had not altered my linking structure that pointed to it. I had not altered my policies either: I did not link TO any PR0 websites, kept the number of links per page down to a minimum and there had been even text descriptions for each and every entry listed.

Google could tell what it was and acted as they saw fit.

There is no point questioning or whining about it. They can and they are doing so in order to supply greater outcomes to searchers. You can like it or lump it, but if you want them to give you decent listings, ranks or send you any targeted traffic, their rules count.

My advice: forget *artificial* reciprocal linking totally. The time taken to keep the directory, approve/disaprove submissions (mainly the latter, because the only men and women nevertheless asking for links are crappy PR0 internet sites and spammers) can be considerably better spent.

When you want to exchange links with other web sites, make positive you do so in a natural way, by which I mean write about the other web site in some way and spot natural links within the body text.

And contemplate just giving to get. I learned about link emperor review by browsing the Internet. By which I mean, link out to valuable things for the edification or entertainment of your visitors giving no consideration to the instant usefulness of that link to you.

What goes around will come about. For a second way of interpreting this, please glance at: link emperor. When you are noticed as useful, other individuals will link to you. If you think you know anything, you will probably choose to learn about linkemperor. You do then get your links "reciprocated", but it might not be from the identical people to whom you linked.

That is the all-natural way of linking that Google wants to see.

Do not, beneath any circumstances, sustain anything (other than internal navigation) that could appear like merely a list of links / link farm, since Google will discover it, won't like it and will penalize it.

Reciprocal linking, in the form of lists or directories merely created for that quite purpose can't do anything to help you with Google (quite the opposite, in reality) and therefore, est mortuus. [RIP].