Wikipedia And The Nofollow Controversy
Izvor: KiWi
(Nova stranica: If you're maybe not active in the seo community, January 21st, 2007 probably held no significance for you. If you are concerned by politics, you will possibly want to study about [htt…)
Novija izmjena →
Inačica od 14:43, 9. kolovoza 2013.
If you're maybe not active in the seo community, January 21st, 2007 probably held no significance for you. If you are concerned by politics, you will possibly want to study about analysis. However, if you are an internet search engine marketer or SEO, you possibly remember while the time January 21st that Wikipedia died. For the inexperienced eye, Wikipedia is precisely the exact same today as it had been half a year before. But, once you look below the top and take a look, you can see one difference that has had a direct effect around the world of search engine optimization: NOFOLLOW.
In the language of Matt Cutts, 'rel='nofollow' credit can be an easy way for a site to tell search engines that the web site cant or doesnt want to vouch for a link.' Before January 21st, NOFOLLOW was used mainly for blog comments. This served weblog owners lessen comment spam. NOFOLLOW was also found in some situations to represent a link, but this really is a whole other conflict that may need to be preserved for a different report. Visit go to read where to mull over it.
The reason that Wikipedias usage of NOFOLLOW on each confident link caused such a mix is because lots of people considered it as the absolute most hypocritical choice that Wikipedia might have made. The reason that Wikipedia has become so common and works so effectively in the SERPs is that people and website owners frequently guide Wikipedia. When they do that, they provide a link back to Wikipedia. Each time this process occurs, Wikipedia increases a tad bit more popularity within the search engines. They're telling the various search engines that while we reference a website and may use content from it in our report, we do not want you to give it any credit, when Wikipedia decided to apply the NOFOLLOW label. It's for this reason that many have began to view as a hypocrisy Wikipedia.
Wikipedia may have chosen an alternative method for fighting spam that didn't punish quality web sites which deserve to be identified by Wikipedia, even though NOFOLLOW has probably lessen the total amount of spam Wikipedia has to combat, but as much the others have explained. Dig up more on this partner website by clicking How To Talk To Some Seo Professional337 - Free Travel Blogs.
