My complaint about Steven w Krivit
Izvor: KiWi
He is sensitive a' and seemingly impervious - to criticism, and current transactions demonstrate this. It's been said that a writer who edits his own work has a fool for a manager, and Krivit has demonstrated that. His belief that concepts determine phenomena, as opposed to the change.
"The phenomenon you have observed is difficult, crazy stuff. We know of no device which could explain your results, so we have grave suspicions about the accuracy your statement. There's no room on your
Leads to modern theory, in order that they just cannot exist. You are obviously the victim of errors, hoaxers, or self-delusion. We do not need to submit your report, and any attempts at replicating your benefits will be a waste of time. Your requests for capital steven krivit are misguided, and must be turned down."aa
Previously Krivit was dealing with the main researchers in the field. Most of them won't talk with him anymore, because he turns what they say, extracting whatever he can state is wrong and introducing that and emphasizing it, with an important exception: he's Mr. Kid Gloves when it involves Widom-Larsen theory.aa I've been finding that he has reconfigured his web site to make it difficult to find criticism of W-L theory, and in new threads -- under the title "Critique of Widom-Larsen theory" -- I have reported this. What he's allowed, probably because it was published under peer review or separately, he provides with a introduction.AWhat he accuses others of is what he's, himself, doing.
This letter isn't a debate contest by which I encourage you to accept me or vice versa. This letter can be involved only with establishing the facts about Steven w Krivit. Before I say anything else, let me remind Steven that there is a problem here. A sizable, dangerous, uncompromising one.
I'm no psychiatrist. However, from the little I know about psychiatry I may say that Steven appears to present most of the apparent symptoms of Asperger's syndrome. I do not say that to judge but merely to put Steven's rapacious, inaniloquent plans in to perspective. He says that truth is only a social construct. That's a silly thing to say. It's like saying that the world's salvation comes from vagaries, irrationality, and delusions.
Steven targets emotions rather than facts. Certain, he attempts to twist and distort details to justify his thoughts, but that only goes to show that in my view, everybody ought to be aware of the real history of Steven's junta. Though his junta began as a faction of his frightening coven, it quickly morphed into Steven's primary mechanism for parlaying private and political conspiracy theories into a multimillion-dollar financial empire.
The significance of the change is that the claim that without Steven's exceptional assistance, we'll go nowhere is illusory. That fact may not be nice, but it is just a fact irrespective of our needs on the problem.
Steven is remarkably bad. Nevertheless, while the Buddha remarked, there's to be bad in order that good could prove its purity above it. I am sure that if the Buddha lived in modern times, though, he'd also touch upon how Steven's remonstrations may have been conceived in idealism, but they rapidly degenerated into unprincipled academicism.
Even with no further evidence than what I've previously introduced I would allegea'and no person on Earth can alter my opiniona'that if we fail to instill a feeling of responsibility and maturity in those that make problems far worse than could actually have been the case without his addlepated efforts then our sacrifices will be as forgotten as the sand blowing across Ozymandias's dead empire. The "decay of that heavy wreck," because the poet Shelley puts it, shows us that all of the negative things that are currently going on are an indication of Steven's ugly prAcis. They are not a cause; they are an effect. We ought to nurture and create a true spirit of community. To accomplish anything else, and I really do mean anything else, is a complete waste of time.
Pertinacious pseudo-intellectuals exacerbate and promote passivity in some people that might otherwise be active and responsible people. Having said that, we should not lose sight of who the real enemy is: his meretricious loyalists and Steven t Krivit. One may possibly conclude that his meandering and maundering comments surely show that Steven expects to influence the perceptions of dominant culture towards any setting or action that is mainly slaphappy some time soon.
Alternately, one may conclude he provides easy solutions to complex dilemmas. In any case, you will find two sorts of people in this world. There are those who stifle dissent, and there are those who address the legitimate rage, anxiety, and alienation of individuals who have been mobilized by Steven simply because they found no other options for change. Steven fits nicely into the former class, needless to say. Sorry for babbling so much, but Steven t Krivit expects everybody else to appeal to his every idiosyncratic whim.
"Talent hits a target no-one else can hit; master hits goals no-one
else could see." - SchopenhauerSteven Krivit Paid by Charles Entenmann & Widom- Larsen?
